Tuesday, June 17, 2008

St Anthony - the patron saint of things lost

His Grace is most disappointed that none of his loyal Roman Catholic communicants or his readers from the Republic of Ireland noticed this most interesting coincidence on the Lisbon Treaty referendum:

A happy coincidence and just deserts (sic)!

Friday, June 13, the Feast of Saint Anthony, Patron Saint of Lisbon!

Despite his Italian reputation, Anthony was in fact very Portuguese and is the patron saint of Portugal's capital city. Anthony also doubles as patron saint of things lost!

Lisbon, no longer the treaty city, its reputation restored, a wonderful capital perched on its seven hills along the banks of the Tagus, a city with 2,000 years of history and the odd non- treaty-related earthquake.

Why take so much delight in a failed referendum?

Because the democracy-loving Irish Government has consistently refused to give the vote to Irish citizens living in Lisbon, in Portugal and throughout the European Union.

Ireland, the only country in Europe who disenfranchises its own citizens, the very citizens daily and directly concerned by the European Union.

Maybe they might give us the vote the next time ?


Notwithstanding the intervention of St Anthony, here is a chilling assessment from New Europe:

‘The EU has now accumulated significant (bad) experiences with referenda. It was very delicately yet effectively communicated by the Romanian social-democrat MEPs: “The referendum in Ireland has demonstrated that direct democracy (by way of referendum) cannot ensure the progress of the European process. The security, liberty and prosperity of hundreds of millions of European citizens ask for complex leadership actions, which cannot be appreciated by heterogeneous populations, from the point of view of the information level and the education one. European integration is a process that must be conducted politically by the elected representatives of the European citizens.”’

So there you have it. It is not only the Irish who are thick; all citizens of the EU are so utterly dense that they ‘cannot appreciate’ the ‘complexity’ of the ‘European process’, such that it must henceforth be ‘conducted politically’ only by those who do.

“It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once” (David Hume 1752).


Blogger Mission Impossible said...

If more people had the {{temporary!! :-( }} luxury of doing as much independent research as I do, then they would probably reach very similar conclusions ... that the people we have habitually dismissed as "conspiracy nutters" may actually have it right, or at least 'more right' than most orthodox and less adventurous folk. It would appear they have latched onto a scent, and it does lead to some very dark, ancient, and secret places.

The European Project being born along on a wave of radical elitism, as so eloquently highlighted in the form of Cranmer's 6:19 AM article, is not the brainchild of Euro MPs. They may give public expression to this elitism, they may be the ones infected by this phenomenon as it reassuringly preens their over-sized egos; but I doubt these ordinary, and often rather stupid mortals have the intellectual capacity to actually create such a paradigm.

Others can waffle, and exchange comments of frustration at such political arrogance until they are blue-in-the-face, but in the final analysis they are really only taking up bandwidth that could be put to better use. Where is our more focused analysis? Where is our flair? Where is our experimentation? The old formulae haven't served us too well so far have they.

Trouble is, a more focused analysis would inevitably take us into "conspiracy theorist" territory, and not enough ordinary folk are yet ready for that. The few who are already willing and able to dabble are too embarrassed to admit it. That is a pity, as my own research has led me to conclude a gold-mine waits to be explored.

It is easier to cope with a bad conscience, than with a bad reputation --- Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche.

17 June 2008 at 09:31  
Anonymous John Knox said...

As the great earthquake of Lisbon in the 18th century led to conversions all over Europe, St Anthony would be pleased to see the shockwave the Irish send out on his Saint's day!

17 June 2008 at 10:41  
Blogger The Heresiarch said...

Interesting that the quote is from a Romanian. The language is certainly that of an old-fashioned Eastern bloc Communist, is it not?

17 June 2008 at 11:23  
Anonymous red despot spotter said...

if this Lisbon treaty is 90% of the EU constitutional treaty , then the labour goverment must be commiting a 90% fraud by not allowing there election manefesto promise!!


17 June 2008 at 17:36  
Blogger Homophobic Horse said...

So who's really behind Jewrope "Mission Impossible"?

17 June 2008 at 18:15  
Blogger Mission Impossible said...

Zbigniew Brzezinski, a former national security adviser, said that the pro-Israel lobby in the US was too powerful, while the slur of anti-Semitism was too readily used whenever its power was called into question.

Google to confirm the authenticity.

17 June 2008 at 18:54  
Blogger ultramontane grumpy old catholic said...

The best type of Englishman is an Irishman George Bernard Shaw

17 June 2008 at 19:04  
Anonymous some bloke said...

" from the point of view of the information level and the education one."

Is that supposed to mean something or just be difficult to understand ?

Europe gets scarier by the week.

Hi MI5 ! "wavey"

18 June 2008 at 01:00  
Blogger Mission Impossible said...

It would appear that NICOLAS SARKOZY is emerging as the leader of the push to ignore the Irish Vote against the Lisbon Treaty (EU Constitution).

The average British, American, Canadian, and European citizen has been mentally conditioned to recoil in shock and horror whenever the word "Jew" is used pejoratively, even when it isn't really meant that way. This is the result of over 40 years of media propaganda and the well-funded activities of Jew-centric propaganda organizations specializing in "victimology."

If one wishes to understand the truth of what is going on in both the USA and Europe right now, one has to recognize the obvious patterns that have already emerged. To expose these patterns is not to incriminate Jews as a group (remember that followers of Judaism comprise several different races, including Ethiopian, and belong to several sometimes mutually antagonistic Sects) but rather to question and expose the astonishing frequency with which Jewish persons (or persons with hidden Jewish backgrounds) keep emerging as champions of all we despise, and of all that threatens our future national identity.

As I understand it, the Talmud requires Jews to contribute to the society (country) in which they live and not to do anything to undermine its integrity. Many Jews have spoken out against the move towards "One World-ism" and Corporate tyranny that increasingly characterizes the enforced progress of both the EU, and of NAFTA. They need to do much more.

Jewish (or if you prefer, Zionist) interests dominate both the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, and indeed the Bank of England. This simple fact should disturb anyone who professes to call him or herself, a democrat. Just because the President of Iran happens to agree with such observations does not make them wrong. In some respects, the Arabs are currently being used just as the ordinary Jews in Europe were used during the 1930s (i.e., as bogeymen).

So, if Sarkozy is one of the central players in the imposition of the EUSSR upon an increasingly disenfranchised public, who or what exactly is this man?

The following are extracts posted by Brother Nathanael Kapner, on 17 June. He is based in Colorado, USA.


FRENCH PRESIDENT NICOLAS SARKOZY RECENTLY ADMITTED to his Jewish roots while on an EU tour of Greece on June 6 2008. In a popular book, “Nicolas Sarkozy’s Salonika,” Sarkozy reveals that his maternal grandfather, Aaron Mallah, (b 1890), was part of the Sephardic Jewish community in Salonika before moving to Paris in the early 1900’s. Sarkozy’s Mallah family is one of the oldest Jewish families of Salonika, Greece. To this day many of the Mallah family are still active Zionists around the world.

Sarkozy’s great uncle, Moshe Mallah, was a well-known Rabbi and a devoted Zionist who in 1898 published “El Avenir” the leading paper of the Zionist national movement in Greece at the time.

Sarkozy's great cousin, Asher Mallah, was a Senator in the Greek Senate, and in 1912, he helped to establish the “Technion ” an elite technological university in Haifa, Israel. In 1919 Asher Mallah was elected as the first President of the Zionist Federation of Greece.

GIVEN SARKOZY’S ZIONIST FAMILY TIES and his installment to the EU Presidency next month - a Sarkozy-Rothschild connection can be demonstrated.

One month after Sarkozy’s election to the Presidency of France in 2007, Sarkozy admitted that during the campaign he contacted his “friend” Edouard de Rothschild, the owner of France’s daily Libération, to complain about a journalist’s article about him. Edouard de Rothschild proffered his empathy to Sarkozy and no more unfavorable articles appeared in Libération again.

Sarkozy [should be seen] as a puppet of the Rothschild controlled European Central Bank [which] is hell bent on sacrificing France’s sovereignty and the sovereignty of all other European nation states on the altar of a One World Government.


All our most significant problems can be traced back to the almost total dominance of our financial system by a handful of Jewish families ... a banking monopoly that dates back to before the time of Napoleon.

For over a decade, Jewish banking interests were actually financing the Third Reich and Adolf Hitler ... because they do not care who delivers them absolute power over all of Europe, so long as it is delivered.

It is because of this unusual, over-weaning dominance of our daily lives --- and even (judging by some of the deranged comments left here at Cranmer) over our thought processes --- that we keep seeing a massively disproportionate number of Jews reaching high office in our governments: Sir Keith Joseph, Leon Brittan (Brittansky), Peter Mandelson, Jack Straw, the Milliband Brothers, not to mention several senior (and often controversial) figures in our Judiciary. That is just the short list! Over 65% of the Bill Clinton administration were Jewish, and all the many Neocons in the Bush presidency have been Jews. Key mid-tier Immigration officials in the British Home Office (Civil Servants) got the third-world immigration ball rolling during the 1960s: they were Jewish and were named in books that have since been banned or made difficult to find.

It isn't because these people have higher IQs or because they are God's Chosen People ... their lofty appointments are simply being arranged that way by high-placed persons and by banking interests acting behind the scenes. There has always been a long term goal and placing operatives in strategic positions (Home Office, Foreign Office, and Judiciary) have been an essential element to their goal of subverting democracy and the very foundations of our society.

The long term, indeed the ultimate goal, is to create a One World Government with its capital in Jerusalem. The steps already taken should make this clear to those who have refused to be intimidated to deny the evidence of their own faculties, especially their eyes.

Already, a massive Supreme Court has been constructed (completed about 2 years ago) in Jerusalem (as yet unused) that was designed according to Kabbalistic principles. It was financed by the Rothschilds. It is believed this court will enforce Noahide Laws on those captured by our transnational entities.

The European Union is simply a staging post towards their aim of totalitarian control. NAFTA and ASEAN, and an expanded EU are simply parallel organizations that will be joined up after 10 or 20 more years. The formation of the United Nations was to condition you to accept a global agency. This is why the UN was based in New York: the Jewish capital city of the West (Jerusalem being their capital in the East).

Their credo dates all the way back to Babylon. It has little to do with the ordinary Judaism (predicated on the Torah) you may see practised in North London, for example.

The statue of a Bull that exists in Wall Street does not exist just so we can use the terms: 'Bulls and Bears' when referring to market trends; that Bull actually represents a sacred Cult-God that dates back to Ancient Egyptian. Its name is Apis.

Apis is what the hidden kingpins of Wall St. worship. Question: What makes up the Logo for Merril Lynch??? Do you really think these logos have no hidden meaning?

"And all the people brake off the golden earrings which were in their ears, and brought them unto Aaron. And he received them at their hand, and fashioned it with a graving tool, after he had made it a molten calf: and they said, These be thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt." - Exodus 32:3,4

"Whereupon the king took counsel, and made two calves of gold, and said unto them, It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem: behold thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt. And he set the one in Bethel, and the other put he in Dan." - 1 Kings 12:28-29

In ancient Babylon, where the Judaeans were exiled, the bull was worshiped as part of the cult of Nimrod.

In other words, our whole culture is being run, ultimately, by a bunch of very rich Pagans who plan to turn you into a 21st century version of a medieval serf. This ideology was carried into Europe long ago, by the Phoenician-Jews. You can mock all you like; we know the truth is usually unpalatable and people like to lash out when they feel humiliated or threatened.

But, those of you who are wise and mature will have to take up the slack left by the many fools and begin to strategize a defence, and preferably soon.

18 June 2008 at 08:03  
Blogger Prodicus said...

OT perhaps, but have you thought of blogging the Queen's position on Britain's accession to the Lisbon Treaty? It seems to me to go against parts of her Coronation Oath, ceding, as it does, some of her authority, 'the Sovereign in Parliament' being our ultimate lawmaker - for now. Well, actually, some of that's gone, of course... European Court etc., but you get my drift.
Is our constitutional settlement, in fact, legitimate under the dispensations of the EU, or are the two in conflict, legally and juridically?

18 June 2008 at 09:34  
Blogger Mission Impossible said...

Prodicus ... you raise a crucial issue that few have addressed head on. Those few who have (not I, I might add) usually fail to attract a sufficiently erudite response.

With regards to the EU, the position of our Sovereign is most enigmatic, and requires a great deal of homework to unravel.

May I venture ... her role (or more appropriately her mis-role) in Britain's continuing accession to various EU treaties is precisely the reason why some blog contributors raise the issue of the so-called Illuminati. For it can only be those at the very top of the pyramid who could bring her along. Indeed, for all we know, she may be knowingly complicit in what amounts to high treason.

The constitutional implications are mind-boggling and very worrying.

This is what Parliament was created for ... to address and make public such concerns. It makes you wonder WHO is actually in control of the United Kingdom. There has to be unseen forces ... there is simply no other conclusion that comes close to interlocking with all the available evidence.

18 June 2008 at 09:48  
Anonymous Peter Mc said...

Your Grace, they should pray to St Jude.

Patron saint of lost causes and hopeles cases.

18 June 2008 at 10:12  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer›  ‹Older